|
|
i can answer one question... the tachometer in their dash they are talkin about is not the one on the website. I have purchased the one they use, the Daytona Racing Tach, which goes up to 18,000 rpm. >From: Marko >Reply-To: moped@topica.com >To: moped@topica.com >Subject: Re: Tomos Mopeds 1995 to 2000 do not a a Electronic rev limiter in >the CDI >Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 11:22:42 -0700 > > >We have had several changes with ignition systems being switched and >substituted in the factory without our knowledge. When assembling some new >mopeds we called there importer and asked some questions about the new >ignition systems and they did not even know of the change until we called. > >Is there a possibility that some of the mopeds have the restricted CDI and >some don't? >I've been talking about this with the Tomos Service Department, and the >guys >said that it has a restrictor. This was apparently the No1 question from >the >service shops, as the engines were bogging down when revved unloaded, after >they started mouning the CDI ignition back in 1995.. Then I talked to the >R&D and they confirmed it, but warned that it is of a non-conventional >type, >as I have previously explained (doesn't cut out ignition) and works >combined >with the restrictive thermal unit. > > >We responded to the restricted CDI (electronic module) as our hand held >tachometer which counts the spark pulses directly at the spark plug and our >direct connection in dash tachometer show no evidence of electronic >restriction in the CDI unit. > >I have seen the dash tachometer on your website, it only counts up to 8000. >Which brings an interesting question of how you were able to measure the >RPM >over 8000 under load e.g. when driving- when you measured it with the hand >held, did you just rev it up on the stand, or did you actually drive the >thing around? > > >We are not looking for 100% accuracy but can tell you these mopeds are >performing well. > >That's a very abstract statement. You have said in your previous post that >you have achieved 50-55 mph top speed at revs of 8000-9500, but the actuall >revs at that speed are 10000-11000. So what has been stated incorrectly on >your part here, the RPM reading or the top speed? > >list. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
| ||||||||||